The more I peruse the ongoing argle-bargle regarding the Cincinnati Reds’ decision-making with respect to players, managers, coaches, strategy, et cetera, the more I’m convinced fans and interested onlookers are unaware or unwilling to accept the nitty-gritty details that make up this organizational makeover, one that has been in the making for some time. Sure, the general public has been vaguely made aware by use of the words “situational hitting” and the way it has been sold as a Wegovy-like injection of philosophy that will slim down the wasted at bats and create a leaner, meaner lineup for Terry Francona. But does it? And where did all this come from?

On the surface, it began a year ago when the new process started along with the hire of Francona. However, from this outsider’s perspective, it felt like it began with the parting of ways with Driveline founder Kyle Boddy in the fall of 2021 after a short 2-year stint following the departure of Dick Williams. Williams believed in the Driveline approach and Boddy in particular, but the front office tandem of Nick Krall/Brad Meador did not, apparently. Other coordinator departures followed, as Krall & Co. began the task of moving in a fundamentally different direction.

With the firing of the analytic-friendly David Bell and the subsequent hiring of Francona, the front office signaled a return to what Charlie Goldsmith has referred to in his reporting as a more “holistic” approach to the game, an approach that showed itself in real time against the Pittsburgh Pirates, when the manager failed to lift TJ Friedl in the 8th inning, leaving Dane Myers on the bench in what many saw as an obvious pinch-hitting situation.

As Goldsmith has reported, at the beginning of the Tito Tenure, Krall and Meador were committed to changing the hitting approach throughout the organization, mimicking the top-down unified strategy headed by Derek Johnson on the pitching side. Just as there were too many differing philosophies in development on the mound at various levels of the organization, it was decided the same issue existed on the hitting side. Accordingly, just as Johnson drives the decision-making within his own purview to considerable success, so was Chris Valaika chosen to direct how hitters are selected, taught, triaged, and developed up and down the organization. Those screaming for the firing of Valaika are likely wasting their time. This development strategy is still very much in its youth, and a decision to reverse course on such a broad scale would surely create internal chaos, not to mention conflict with Francona, who strongly believes in Valaika and his baseball acumen.

A close examination of the pedigreed resumes of the staff reveals a group Francona values from his days with Boston and Cleveland. Reds farm director Jeremy Farrell worked for the Red Sox during the Theo Epstein era, and worked closely with Valaika when both were with the Chicago Cubs, again with Epstein. And, of course Valaika was Francona’s hitting coach with the Indians.

Everything the Reds are doing on the hitting side seems to be in line with a hitting philosophy Francona either believes in or has adopted by necessity. More bunting; less emphasis on power and an unwillingness to accept the strikeouts that go along with that approach. Less analytics and more of what Francona and the front office refer to as “The Art of Hitting.”

The difficulty with this approach is it comes a cropper when faced with guys on the mound throwing sliders, sweepers, and cutters at ever increasing speed. Velocity, coupled with a dramatic increase in horizontal and vertical break have made the old school art of taking a pitch the other way a much more difficult task, which is why major league hitters across baseball continue to pull the ball in the air, choosing power over contact. As Detroit Tigers manager A.J. Hinch said in a recent Athletic piece, “Even though we changed the shift in the infield, we didn’t change that the optimal ball in play is the ball in the air.”

With the shift outlawed and fielders forced to play with their feet in the dirt, short line drives find more terra firma in front of outfielders, which is yet another reason the Reds may want Ke’Bryan Hayes, Elly De La Cruz and Matt McLain maximizing the coverage the shift no longer provides. Moreover, the wide open spaces on one side of the diamond the shift once attempted to entice hitters to slap the ball toward are largely gone.

The front office knows the turning of this aircraft carrier and its philosophy away from a dominant sports science approach to a “hit tool” focus is a slow one that will take time just as it did on the pitching side. It may partially explain why Francona has stuck with Friedl, McLain and the rest of the struggling offense, giving them a longer leash as the organizational approach changes. What we know is that like Dusty Baker, Francona is very loyal to his guys, and believes buttressing his players’ confidence is best for them individually and for clubhouse harmony as a whole.

It also possibly explains why the Reds are slow to promote players who have recently excelled at the plate at Louisville. It’s not merely that the gap between the pitching at AAA and the big leagues is a significant gulf, but may also be a reason to slow promotions as they turn to the task of teaching these inchoate athletes those situational skills they haven’t focused on before—e.g., bunting, the hit-and-run—making choices that Valaika refers to as “playing to the scoreboard.” As a preemptive comment, those that insist bunting fundamentals are little league skills, should be cautioned against comparing the skills needed to sacrifice bunt against 12-year old arms with the velocity and movement of the likes of Paul Skenes.

Opinions like the above illustrate just how out of touch many are with the decision-making that has been predetermined courtesy of a budget set down by ownership, a budget only extended when Krall went to the Castellinis and pleaded for an additional $15M to sign Eugenio Suárez, whose free agent value had plummeted. Trading pitching for a middle of the lineup slugger over the winter was never in the cards, even if one foolishly believes the Reds had plenty of arms, even before the setbacks to Hunter Greene, Nick Lodolo, Rhett Lowder, Brandon Williamson and now possibly Brady Singer.

There’s little question who will be blamed if this new approach on the offensive side of the ball fails. It’s a broken record at this point that has long been a fait accompli with many, and perhaps even warranted. However, I’m going to channel my inner Todd Rundgren and bang the drum all day blaming ownership for the bind this front office and manager have been subjected to.

If you have to covet your prospects to the extent that you cannot use them to improve the team because they are the sole source of your success (now and in the future) and lack the funds to bolster the team with difference-makers—power hitters and top-of-the-rotation starting pitchers—the margin for error is too small for the people that have to build a winning lineup and maintain it over 162 games, much less multiple seasons.

If the nerds have been relegated to the children’s table at dinnertime and the old school grownups are left to pursue their Art of Hitting philosophy, they’d better get it right or the Cincinnati Reds are headed for another decade in the dungeon of the National League Central.

71 Responses

  1. Steve

    I’ve said for years, I believe the Reds are trying to become Tampa Bay Rays 2.0.

    • TR

      The Rays are having a fine year, so far.

    • Mike

      Pretty sure Krall said that somewhere around 2022

    • David

      The difference between the Tampa Bay Rays and the Reds is the Rays are ruthlessly devoted to having great analytical analysis of all their players and potential acquisitions, and they trade any player when he becomes too expensive, ie, exceeds the value determined by the management team.

      The Reds by contrast do NOT seem to be able to properly evaluate talent they have and what they need to acquire. Which is not to say that Krall and Meador and the rest always make bad trades, or bad signings. Jeimer Candalario is the most OBVIOUS bad signing in recent times, but other player acquisitions have actually worked well. But the Reds do not seem to apply all the player analytics that the Rays use.
      I was very interested in what Craig Counsell said when he interviewed for the field manager of the Rays some years ago. He was incredibly impressed by what the Rays did to analyze their players and build a team that was consistent with a certain playing philosophy. Craig carried that with him to the Brewers job, and I think is also trying to make this work in Chicago.

    • CTSCRIBE

      Argle-bargle? I knew right there we had a problem. I will assume you have access to Francona and Krall although the only quotes you have is what you read elsewhere. The fact of the matter is the top 3 in the rotation are either injured or trying to come back, and juggling the lineup is an exercise in futility.

      • greenmtred

        As it would be for almost any team.

    • Dennis Schiavone

      @Richard Fitch. Now can you explain what it takes to send a spacecraft to Mars. Nice article

    • Denver Buckeye

      Except the Rays invest heavily in the data analytics side.

  2. Kevin H

    Great article and the explanation is spot on.

  3. greenmtred

    Thought provoking as always, Richard.

  4. Cincy6464

    Richard is spot-on with many points. But what are the alternatives?
    > Open the checkbook Dodger-style – not possible.
    > Sign every free-agent available Mets-style – not good IMO.
    > Build an organization around pitching & fundamentals – reasonable if done well.
    It’s the “done well” that is hard. Is our FO as good as our NLC counterparts? I guess 2026 will tell us.

    • Doc

      Not a solvable problem unless/until MLB levels the playing field ala essentially every other major professional team sport has done. Won’t happen in the remainder of my natural lifetime so I don’t lose sleep over it. I fondly remember the Crosley Field days; since then baseball is just of passing interest, but not something to get worked up over.

      • Redsfan63

        Agree that unless there is a salary cap small market teams have to get lucky drafting or in internationally signings to win a WS sporadically as they provide essentially a Majors proving ground feeder system for big market (and much deeper pocketed) teams/owners. Kudos, regrettably…, to the Cardinals, a small/mid market team, with a more active fan base (good attendance) and good baseball mgmt have a good overall track record for their market size.

      • Chris

        75 76 was of passing interest?! Those teams were the greatest summers of my boyhood!

      • Doug Gray

        I just don’t buy the “passing interest” thing. You aren’t getting online every day and leaving comments about something 50 years after something became a “passing interest”.

      • MFG

        SPOT ON DOC!
        MLB is currently a broken system. Dodgers have an unlimited payroll.
        Elly will even be playing there soon.

  5. doofus

    Can mlb force owners to open up their audited financial statements to the public?

    • Doug Gray

      The owners ARE MLB. So technically, they could, but why would they tell themselves to do that?

      • greenmtred

        So a bunch of fans don’t abandon the sport? Not that I think that’s likely…

      • Doug Gray

        It’s not likely, so it’s not going to happen.

        I talked about it over on Bluesky the other day when the new Braves financials came out and we saw how much the CEO for the baseball division of the Braves is making per year – Just over $6,000,000 in cash a year, with potential stock options of nearly $14,000,000 per year. The EVP of Business, the EVP of Development (not like player development), the CLO, and the CFO make a combined $9.4M a year before also having stock options of up to $15.3M a year. Teams don’t want you to know that stuff. They will open their books when there’s tar boiling next to them and the feathers are ready.

        Bob Castellini has always said the team makes no profit and all money goes back into the team, but he never shares how much he pays himself or his son or the Williams brothers who all have front office jobs.

      • BK

        This is true … any salaries paid out would negate profit. CEOs and CFOs of businesses that are worth $1B+ make those kinds of salaries. I’m not arguing that their pay isn’t over the top, but it’s not atypical, and I’m not sure it’s reasonable to expect an MLB franchise’s officers to donate their time so they can better compete with franchises located in more lucrative markets.

        That said, it’s crazy that MLB has a model where many franchises are making nearly all of their profit in the appreciation of their franchise’s value, AND are at a huge competitive disadvantage in acquiring talent compared to other franchises. For an industry that has been in business for 100+ years, that’s rare. It’s hard to see a non-emotional argument that MLB’s economic structure is working well for fans, the majority of players, or even most of the owners.

  6. LDS

    The issue isn’t necessary the strategy so much as the execution. More time? Maybe. Better players? Certainly. If Francona correct? Most likely. Can the current crop crop of players, e.g., Hayes, McLain, Friedl, etc. make the change? One should definitely be skeptical, especially regarding player that have been on the downward trajectory for a while. Is loyalty from the manager a good thing? Yes, until such loyalty begins to erode results. Are we at that point now? Hard to say. Giving Tito the benefit of the doubt is the smart play, no question. The same can’t be said for Krall and the Castellinis.

  7. ksdavis

    The Reds have tried to model themselves after the Rays. But here is the problem.

    Since 2010 Rays 90+ wins 7 times, Reds 3. Playoff appearances Rays since 2010 – 8, Reds 5. And the Rays have actually won a playoff series. Over the last 10 years the Rays record is 829-698, the Reds 704-822.

    Rays consistently have a decent farm system. Two years ago, the Lookouts were close to being the worst record in the minors, the Dragons last year among the worst, Daytona not trending in a positive direction this year.

    The Rays tend to trade players when value is the highest, Reds hold on.

    So I am skeptical of the Reds changing their approach on hitting. One mock draft has them drafting a high school outfielder know for his power more than the overall hit tool. GABP is built for power players, and I think the Reds will try to fit the mold in players they draft or sign.

    As far as a power bat – many of the bats linked to the Reds in the last couple of years are not having good years this year. The only player linked to the Reds that is having a decent year is Jo Adell. What would have been the cost to bring him to the Reds?

  8. wizeman

    Doug… do we control Bleday thru a couplle of arb seasons?

    • Tom Diesman

      Not Doug, but yes, the Reds control Bleday via arbitration for the 2027 and 2028 seasons. He’s not eligible for free agency until 2029.

      • CI3J

        I thought he only signed a 1-year contract?

      • Tom Diesman

        Here’s the link to MLB Trade Rumors story regarding the Reds signing Bleday:

        https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/12/reds-sign-jj-bleday.html

        It contains:

        “The Reds have signed outfielder JJ Bleday, according to FanSided’s Robert Murray. MLB.com’s Mark Sheldon adds that the contract is a one-year Major League contract, …..

        The contract will pay Bleday $1.4MM in guaranteed money, plus more is available via incentives…

        MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz projected Bleday to earn $2.2MM in his first of three trips through the arbitration process. The Athletics chose to move on entirely by designating Bleday for assignment in November, and he was then cut loose at the non-tender deadline. The Reds now control Bleday through the 2028 season, and since he has a minor league option remaining, Cincinnati can send him back to down to Triple-A if necessary.”

  9. Oldtimer

    I’m just looking at Reds history in my lifetime (more or less).

    Lousy from 1945 to 1960 (except 1956) despite good talent from the mid 1950s on.

    The best W-L record in NL from 1956 to 1981. Four NL pennants. Two WS titles. Only bad years were 1960, 1966, and 1971. Those are the Reds that I followed starting as a kid.

    Not bad, not great in the 1980s. Pretty good in most of the 1990s.

    Since 2000, only really good in 2010, 2012, and 2013. GM Jocketty and MGR Baker at the helm. Experienced, well qualified management (in a suit or baseball uniform).

    Those of us who lived in the BRM era of the 1970s are spoiled by those results. Those teams are collectively (and arguably) the best NL teams ever.

    Take away the BRM years, and the Reds are a .500 throughout their history.

    • Richard Fitch

      The BRM’s last WS win coincides with the year the reserve clause was struck down.

      Those Jockety/Baker years were a result of Votto, Bruce, Bailey, Chapman and Cueto coming up at about the same time, and a little work that was done bringing in Phillips and Latos.

      • David

        Phillips was an absolute steal. The Indians waived him because they thought that, as a Shortstop in the minors, he wouldn’t play 2nd base.
        Well, surprise.
        After the ’76 WS, Howsam said that this would be the last team that would be built this way, as he knew the reserve clause was going away, and it would be very costly to put together and keep talented players, especially for small and mid-market teams.

      • Oldtimer

        I don’t recall any Reds teams winning without at least a half a dozen really good players. Jocketty (trades) and Baker (on field management decisions) played key roles.

      • greenmtred

        OT: I doubt that any team has been very successful without half a dozen good players.

      • Oldtimer

        True. That’s why the comment above (listing some of the Reds key players in the 2010 to 2013 timeframe) was puzzling.

        Jocketty traded for Rolen. He signed Chapman. He traded for Latos. He has a chance at HOF someday.

        Dusty is a future HOF manager.

    • David

      That’s a very good point, regarding the lifetime record of the Reds, negating the BRM years, when they had a very astute GM in Bob Howsam.

      Good management, really good management, costs money. I think that the various ownership groups in Reds’ history (such as the Castellini group), have been loathe to spend a lot of money on quality and very smart management people in baseball. Especially in analytics. Dick Williams (the younger) seemed to have that interest, but that’s gone with the wind. So we get Krall and Meador, and the rest. Don’t know how much they are making (and kinda don’t care), but I don’t think they are top drawer baseball guys, and not paid like top-drawer baseball guys either. They are not terrible and stupid, although they have done some dumb things at times.
      The Reds have drafted unevenly. There have some good drafts, and some bad draft selections. Very good scouting and analytics should minimize the bad draft selections. But drafting players is a crap shoot sometimes. Scouting and signing outside of the US, such as in the Dominican Republic, and elsewhere, has also been uneven. Johnny Cueto was a big win, as has been Elly De La Cruz. Others, not so much.

      • Doug Gray

        Signing players on the international market as teenagers hasn’t been uneven, it’s been atrocious. You’ve got Johnny Cueto, Elly De La Cruz, and Didi Gregorius to show for the last 30 years. The Reds signed Miguel Rojas, who has turned himself into something, but he became a minor league free agent before ever getting to the big leagues with another organization so I don’t count him as a “success” for them.

        I looked at players with at least 500 at-bats for the Reds since 2000. Aristides Aquino has the 2nd most WAR for the Reds among their international signings in that time. Gregorius had a lot more than that and was traded, so he doesn’t show up on that list. But I can’t think of anyone else of note who was traded away that would be of any note. On the pitchers side of things the guy after Cueto that was an international signing who signed as a teenager? Jose Acevedo, who had 2.0 WAR with the Reds and signed in 1996.

      • Old Big Ed

        I’ve said for years that the Latin American operation was a long time disaster, and maybe the single most glaring reason that the Reds have struggled for most of the last 30 years. Until Elly came along, the last truly good Latin hitter signed and developed by the Reds was a Cuban named Tony Perez.

        That is almost impossible.

        I do think that they have righted the ship, but even then Duno is the only top ten prospect who is Latin and who the Reds signed and developed. Hector Rodriguez came from the Mets, and Arroyo from the Mariners; the Reds have done a good job developing them, but they didn’t sign them. There are a good number of very young players who may develop, but none who are can’t-miss.

      • David

        At Old Big Ed;

        I think that Dave Concepcion was also a Latin American signing (Venezuela), but it did take time for him to develop as a hitter. And he came after Tony. Not trying to be pedantic, but I think that Davey would count.
        Mario Soto? A pitcher, of course.
        The Reds also had Joaquin Andujar, who Sparky did not like very much. He became a pretty good pitcher for the Astros for a few years.

        But successful players out of Latin America signed by the Reds has been pretty thin.

      • Old Big Ed

        David, I restricted the “Perez” issue to hitters. Concepcion had a career OPS+ of 88, and it was 101 even for his core 9 years from 1973-1981. So, being 1% better than an MLB-average hitter in the heart of a career does not in my judgment amount to a “truly good hitter.”

      • Oldtimer

        Reds and Gabe Paul made a strong effort to sign Latin players in the 1950s. Perez was their best signing, but Leo Cardenas and Mike Cuellar weren’t bad. A few others, too. Tony Gonzalez comes to mind.

  10. JCU

    Reds seem committed to the slow approach with development as the goal, but that demands a lot of luck and some creative-clever scouting at the lower levels.

    The eyeball test doesn’t suggest they have an uber-core of top players in the low minors, though there are a few nice prospects. Not sure where this is headed and since they are generally on record as not being overly interested in long-term contracts for free agents, we do have to hope that Valaika and Johnson are successful over a longer period of time.

    In baseball, three years ago is almost ancient history.

    (I will use the words “in my opinion” so as to not confuse people.)

    • Indy Red Man

      Reds vs Rays? Only 1 team was dumb enough to trade for KBH and it wasn’t Tampa. If they found Bleday, they’d note his spring training and he’d break north over Benson. No sentimentality….who makes the team better

      Tito said on-air in April that Myers was dicing up lefties. He was 1-15 at the time. So much for analytics.

      You can copy whoever you want, but if they’re smarter and younger then it won’t work. Tampa does it with our castoffs. Fraley batting 3rd or 5th. Martinez is their #2.
      They’re good. Coaches, GM,farm system. It all works

      • ksdavis

        Fraley is hitting .241 but that is really the only offensive stat that is decent. 2 HR’s and 5 RBI’s. OBP of .310.

        Martinez is doing well so far, but wait until later on in the year to see how he is doing. Tampa may trade him at the trade deadline.

      • VaRedsFan

        Jake Fraley? lol
        They didn’t cast off Nicky Smiles either.
        He was a free agent.

  11. The Duke

    The biggest problem Krall seems to have is avoiding the obvious going to shoot ourselves in the foot blunders:

    Moustakas
    Candelario
    Hayes trade
    I would argue re-signing Pagan for two years at age 35 belongs here but not as bad

    He’ll make a dozen shrewd under the radar moves and then blow a significant chunk of his budget on a move that will enrage the fanbase.

  12. Austin

    This is, admittedly, somewhat anecdotal and in some cases (for players like CES and Hinds especially) based on very small samples, but what constantly sticks in my head is there is a clear pattern of foundational players coming up in our system whose best output is at the very beginning, followed by clear regression. This is surely, in part, simply the league adjusting to them, but when it comes to development, it’s the organization’s job to help them make their own adjustments. The numbers below should seriously call into question the Reds ability to develop offensive players, which is a necessity for an organization that intends to follow the models of franchises like the Rays (mind you, this is simply because it fits within their budget more than anything else). The OPS+ by year of recent core players coming up in our system.

    India: 116, 94, 98, 105
    Stephenson: 106, 133, 85, 112, 99, 65
    McLain: 127, 75, 85
    CES: 112, 39, 63
    Marte: 118, 49, 100, -6
    Hinds: 176, 9, 4

    Elly has been the main one that seems to have bucked that trend, maybe because he’s just that good. Hopefully, it’s not happening to Sal Stewart now. Regardless of the approach, offensive player development is simply not something this organization looks like it knows how to do.

    • DW

      Agreed Austin. There are others that could be added to your list. There is certainly a trend there. And it would be hard to list many hitters that have come up through the Reds system that have had lasting successful careers.

    • greenmtred

      The analysis is only truly meaningful if you compare it to other teams. Baseball is very hard, and MLB baseball discards huge numbers of great athletes who can’t quite hack it.

  13. OK

    Do you think the Marlins would take on Ke’bryan Hayes’ salary if we included a low level prospect.

  14. Jim Walker

    “…Accordingly, just as (Derek) Johnson drives the decision-making within his own purview to considerable success…..”

    To me, a bases-loaded walk by a pitcher seems very analogous to a pick six in professional football.

    How many offensive coordinators in football would still have their jobs if their passers had thrown 15 (or is it 16) pick-sixes in one fourth of a season?

    • Richard Fitch

      Heh. Sorry, Jim. If you want to fire Johnson after the job that has been done drafting and developing this pitching staff.because the pitching lately has been suspect and injured, I don’t know what to tell you. They made the playoffs last year because of the pitching and only because of the pitching. Baseless criticism, IMO. Wow.

      • Jim Walker

        We do not know what role, if any, Johnson plays in draft decisions. It certainly hasn’t hurt that they have had 2x #2 and 2x #4 overall picks during his tenure.

        Since COVID, 2021-25, the Reds pitching has allowed the third most home runs, the third most BB/9 innings, and the eighth most earned runs of all MLB teams during regular season play (per BBReference Stathead).

        Aside from the almost surefire four top 5 overall picks and Abbott, what consistently excellent pitchers have the Reds developed for the rotation or pen in Johnson’s 7+ year tenure?

        Johnson’s performance being beyond reproach is just another part of the ownership narrative.

      • JohnnySofa

        A little rough to call it baseless criticism and then punctuate with a “wow.” Jim makes some valid points. But … if we’re to praise DJ for the pitching, then let’s make the hitting coaches accountable for very poor offense. Especially if we apply the following from the article:

        “Everything the Reds are doing on the hitting side seems to be in line with a hitting philosophy Francona either believes in or has adopted by necessity. More bunting; less emphasis on power and an unwillingness to accept the strikeouts that go along with that approach. Less analytics and more of what Francona and the front office refer to as “The Art of Hitting.”

        I see no art. I see far too many strikeouts, far too many LOB and RISP, far too many games with 3-5 hits if this team indeed has de-emphasized power on purpose (which at GABP is a questionable philosophy).

      • Jedi Joey

        They made the playoffs only because the Mets had a colossal meltdown. 83-79 isn’t that great of a record. Was I happy they made it? Yes of course, but let’s not pretend it was because they were fantastic last season

      • jessecuster44

        they made the playoffs last year because the Mets collapsed and gifted them the 6th and last spot, not because the pitching was magical. come on.

    • Indy Red Man

      I have to go with Richard on this one. I’m pretty sure Connor Phillips was told to throw strikes when they brought him in with bases loaded. Thats on Tito.

      Other then this April Abbott has overachieved with whats he got. HG developed a split (finally) and started dominating, but just can’t stay on the mound. Lodolo had a good year last year. Burns has matured. Ashcraft found a role after floundering. The pen hasn’t been great, but they never splurge on anyone really good either? I said go get Mason MIller after the A’s kept shopping him. Do what it takes, but they do nothing as usual. He’s only throwing 103-104 with 13 for 13 saves. Pagan had never really closed and was good last year, but turns 35. Idk, but I think Johnson is a strength and more then Tito in my book

      • Indy Red Man

        If we had Mason MIller we’d be 26-18 at a minimum right now and maybe 27-17

      • Richard Fitch

        Jim, it’s instructive you claim we don’t know what Johnson’s role is but you have no problem cherry-picking numbers from 2021 through 2025 in a small park and lumping them together and concluding it’s all on Johnson.

        No thought to injuries, who the Reds were willing to pay to replace them. Just blame for the guy who has to deal with payroll limits.

        You also didn’t mention Ashcroft or Santillan. Doesn’t fit the narrative I guess.

        You gave away the game by using the anecdotal narrative of the walk debacle last week. All why ignoring why the Reds had the best April record in decades: the pitching.

        Do anything you want to indict the front office. Just be fair and consistent.

  15. SR

    Agree Jim.
    The Reds seem to become enamored with guys who throw hard with good sliders, but can’t find the plate. It’s not just a draft thing either. Look at pitching staff members thus far. The ENTIRE pitching staff is averaging over 5 walks/9.
    The starting rotation nibbles around the plate, which gets their pitch count up, and wears out the bullpen, which currently can’t find the plate either.
    The reds hitters don’t hit well against pitchers who change speeds and have at least three pitch arsenals,yet you don’t find many pitchers like that on our staff.Phillips, Mey, Maxwell, Burns, Greene, Santillian, Ashcraft, Nicholas, Burke, Petty are all two pitch pitchers.
    We draft and trade for hard throwers but we haven’t cracked the code on how to help them throw more strikes. If we can’t help them learn to throw more strikes, we need to draft and trade for pitchers who already know how. That’s on Johnson.
    And yeah, we made the playoffs by being 4 games over .500 and witnessing a once in a generation failure by the Mets.

    • Jim Walker

      @SR> Even though I agree with Jeff Brantley when he says that the most important thing for a pitcher is to be able to consistently locate a quality fastball for a strike, I wish he weren’t feeling the need to say it as often as he does.

    • Indy Red Man

      Gabp plays into it. Fastballs down the middle aren’t bloop oppo HRs anywhere else
      Maybe Yankee Stadium

      • Jim Walker

        I don’t think Brantley considers any pitch “right down Broadway” to be a well located pitch.

      • Indy Red Man

        True. Ok just a high & away heater which is usually a can of corn when the hitter connects

      • Indy Red Man

        Want some proof on Gabp?

        Orioles won 52 games in 2021. Moved their fences back and raised them prior to 2022. Won 83, 101, and 91 games the next 3 years.

        Moved them back in & shortened the fence before the 2025 season. Went back to 75 wins.

        Tell me that doesn’t matter to your pitchers psyche and confidence

  16. Jedi Joey

    “If you have to covet your prospects to the extent that you cannot use them to improve the team because they are the sole source of your success (now and in the future) and lack the funds to bolster the team with difference-makers—power hitters and top-of-the-rotation starting pitchers—the margin for error is too small for the people that have to build a winning lineup and maintain it over 162 games, much less multiple seasons.”

    This part stuck out to me the most in this article. Is this something that is correctable with the current makeup of MLB with the haves and have nots? Obviously, I don’t know the true financial numbers of the Reds but I still feel that they could do more to put a consistent winner on the field. It all starts at the top with the ownership group. People can blame Nick Krall all they want but it’s not hard to see he is limited by what the big shots will let him do.

  17. Mark Moore

    Thoughtful piece. We rarely win by chasing “simple” solutions to complex problems.

  18. Michael B. Green

    I don’t see “making the playoffs” last year as a success. I think we were maybe 2 games over .500. No offense to anyone. I do think it was growth from the Bell era though.

    • greenmtred

      My recollection is that last year’s team exceeded expectations despite having key players injured for significant parts of the season. It’s certainly true that all teams deal with injury, but the Reds and other teams with modest payrolls probably are disproportionately affected by them.