I don’t mean: Explain this boring inside joke of a conversation. I mean: What is actually, physically inside a regulation Major League Baseball baseball?

One of my favorite exhibits at the Reds Hall of Fame and Museum addressed this. It was the type of museum display children dashed past on their way to find computer-based exhibits to pound, sit on, spit at and then turn to me, great surprise on their faces, to announce that “this doesn’t work.”

When I shepherded school groups through the museum’s upper floors, I used to point to the case holding the bisected specimen and say hey, look, you wanna throw something at somebody? Here you go. Here’s what’s inside. This always impressed the children to the point that they would pause an extra.000000000001 second to ask when lunch was.

After the crowds cleared out and I helped pick up the Fritos bags left by the NO FOOD ALLOWED IN MUSEUM signs, sometimes I’d stop in and study my unraveled friend. There it was. This tiny little white cause of all the trouble.

The guts of one single baseball spread through a long horizontal case. The specimen was between nine to nine and one-fourth inches in circumference and, in its wholeness, weighed five ounces, perhaps five and one-fourth.

It is no small feat to cut apart a baseball. It’s a thing meant to be whole. A baseball enters the world expecting to be thrown, slammed, launched, skidded through the mud; it was not constructed to deconstruct.

So you must take care when splitting open a baseball, perhaps in an attempt to improve upon it. But in so doing, you end its purpose.

Living beings give of their own skin to create the two figure-eight shapes that, arrange in opposition to embrace one another, present the baseball to the outside world. The cover of a baseball is of the finest Midwest Holstein cattle. It was grass once. It was living.

Some say it’s best to start by cutting apart the baseball’s unifying piece, the red thread holding together the cowhide cover. Others unlace the protective parts, which takes longer but at least allows the historical whole of the yarn some dignity. The binding thread is waxed so as to better unify the pieces, and each ball is stitched by hand over a period of thirteen to fourteen minutes. Too much reliance on machinery, you see, results in defective, loose, and altogether wobbly baseball. People are simply better at pulling the pieces together on their own.

Once you slice into the outside of a baseball, there’s no putting it back together again. Because this is what’s within:

More yarn.

A natural fiber, one not made of one strand, but many. Yards and yards and yards and yards of it. Yarn is yarn not because it exists in a string vacuum, but because it depends upon and clings to other strands of itself. It cushions. It protects. It is what keeps the action of the ball within itself. Yarn is a group project.

“Many cheaper baseballs,” says Scientific American, “have only a solid mass of cork/rubber amalgam under the first layer of yarn but with a pro ball the yarn has only just begun.” The relationship between the yarn and the middle of the ball are in forever balance: push and pull, weight and air, nature and synthetics.

At the center of the yarn is a rubber shell and at the center of the rubber shell is a core of cork. Yes. There is, at the heart of a baseball, an actual ball. Although the nucleus of a baseball’s flight, it is unseen, and, left undisturbed, will sit forever and ever.

Once launched into motion, however, that which preserves the wine and seals the gasket can arc for hundreds of feet. Cork is little but trapped air; a baseball in flight is simply oxygen returning to itself.

This is only possible, however, when the baseball is left to be itself, to function as designed. Because once you slice it open, there’s no winding and pulling it back together again. It took generations to get here: The tree. The grass. The air. The cow.

And some would say the yarn has only just begun.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11 Responses

  1. Mark Moore

    Love this, MBE!! It brings back childhood memories of peeling off the outer shell of a golf ball to reveal the seemingly endless rubber bands wound around the core.

    Makes me want to saw a baseball in half 🙂

    • Mary Beth Ellis

      Thanks! Call me over before you start cutting. It sounds awesome.

  2. Tservo

    Stop showing how talented of a writer you are! Someone will notice and steal you from us!

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard better prose on the origins of something that brings so much hope, heartbreak, and memories to so many people across the ages.

    You are awesome MB!

    • Mary Beth Ellis

      This is so very kind– thank you. It makes me feel a lot better about burning the spaghetti tonight 🙂

  3. greenmtred

    Really, really good. The Reds’ museum should consider (with your permission, of course) printing and framing this piece and adding it to the exhibit. I remember taking apart golf balls as a kid: we developed a mythology in which some of the centers (not all, and not the ones we happened upon) were deadly poison. We bravely continued dismantling golf balls, but with a nice edge of fear.

  4. Scott C

    Great piece of journalistic skill, it brought back a lot of memories for me. I grew up in Southeastern Ohio and baseballs were prized possessions. After weeks and months of hitting one the seams would stat to wear, in order to preserve it we would wrap it in electrical tape, (I don’t think duct tape had been invented yet) we could get another month maybe out of a baseball that way but eventually that too would wear and the yarn on the inside would start to unravel and you are right there is a lot of yarn in one baseball. I loved your last line “And some would say the yarn has only just begun.” I got a good laugh.

    • Mary Beth Ellis

      Such wonderful memories 🙂 I’m sure a baseball’s surface occasionally interrupted by tape isn’t affected by aerodynamics AT ALL.

  5. RojoBenjy

    Best piece of writing this year, MBE—all due respect to Clete.

    I daresay he’d give a Holy Cats! But for the good reason

    • Mary Beth Ellis

      Oh thank you. Grandpa was fairly sparing with his Holy Cats, so that’s a great compliment indeed.