The Short Version: Arizona longballs doomed the Reds in Sunday’s series finale, but the Reds still won two of three. So that’s not bad.

Final R H E
Arizona Diamondbacks (65-54) 9 10 1
Cincinnati Reds (52-66) 2 7 0
W: Godley (13-6) L: Castillo (6-10)
FanGraphs Win Probability | Box Score

The Good
–Jose Peraza had a triple and a single, plus a run scored. Eugenio Suarez had two hits and a run scored, as well.

The Bad
–As we’ve seen so many times this season, Luis Castillo looked awfully good for large swaths of this game, but the longball contributed to a final stat line that was not good: 5.2 innings pitched, 5 runs allowed on 5 hits and a walk, with 7 strikeouts.

It was two home runs, one in the first and one in the sixth that scored all the Arizona runs and lost the game.

–Keury Mella was pretty ineffective in his two innings of work: four runs allowed on five hits — three homers allowed — and a walk. Mella’s big league ERA is now 8.68.

Not-So-Random Thoughts
–Reds took two of three from Arizona. I couldn’t think of anything clever to say about this game, so I added a photo of Bret Boone above. I dunno…it’s been a long season, give me a break.

–Quickly down 3-0, the Reds tried to chip away. In the bottom of the second, Eugenio Suarez and Mason Williams led off with singles. Suarez scored when Preston Tucker grounded into a fielder’s choice and Arizona SS Nick Ahmed threw the ball away.

One inning later, the Reds got another run back. Jose Peraza tripled with one out and scored on a Joey Votto sacrifice fly to make the score 3-2, Arizona.

–The Cleveland Indians come to town tomorrow. Homer Bailey will pitch for the home team.

Today’s Tweets

17 Responses

  1. Jeff Morris

    I notice the home run in the first inning was on an 0-2 pitch, so needed a put away pitch there from Castillo, to either strike out the batter or getting him to chase something out of the zone. Also, Goldschmidt very dangerous hitter…should not get any fastballs pitched to him.

    • Rich H

      I actually thought it was a pretty decent pitch, 96mph fastball down and away. Nice piece of hitting by Descalso to go down and get it.

    • Reaganspad

      Goldschmidt got 2 fastballs in a row.

      I did not see Castillo shake him off.

      Not sure I would tell my catcher to pump fastballs to Goldscmidt

    • Rich H

      Just read the postgame, apparently it was supposed to be down and in. I thought it was further outside and higher than it was. Not a good pitch, after watching the replay.

      • Jim Walker

        So he missed by a mile more than either of us thought 😉

    • da bear

      It was a decently located pitch low and away though not right on the corner.

      Might have been a mixup in communication between Barnhart and Castillo however….catcher initially set up right where Castillo threw the ball. Before the actual pitch, Barnhart moved the glove to inside mid level. Descalso might have peeked back caught the initial location set up by Barnhart and expected a pitch there.

      The homer by Goldschmidt was a GASP joke, a popup that drifted barely out of the park.

      A pitcher who cares about their numbers would never sign up to pitch in GASP (or Colorado). Highly doubtful any sabermetrics take the time or care to adjust enough or properly account for the homer inflation in this ballpark.

  2. Broseph

    Something is wrong with Votto. He has no aggressive swings, everything is half-checked, spray the ball opposite field swings. I haven’t seen him take a good rip at a ball in months.

    Will be interesting to see what off season news there is regarding him since it’s so hush hush from media and Reds. Of course, no mention of it here as well, but Thom mentioned the 2 extrabase hits since AS break and others commented in the game thread about his lack of power.

    Votto my favorite Red since Larkin and I hope he is the next to go into the Hall, but he needs two more all star years (pre 2018) and some power numbers to help his case. Here’s hoping there is a quiet injury not being discussed and 2018 is not a tribute to Father Time.

    • roger garrett

      As stated the inside out swing has been there all year long.I still feel he can maintain his obp by walking and hitting singles all day long to left field which is basically what he has done all year long.The last ball he turned on and hit with any power was the homer he smoked in the All Star game.He is now a number 2 hitter which is ok and I do expect he will make some adjustments in the off season.To me he never was a power hitter but rather just a great hitter that took advantage of playing in GABP where he could reach the seats in left easier then the pull side.Winker is the next Votto especially if his shoulder gets fixed.He is the next star along with Suarez on this team.

      • Broseph

        I’m good with him getting his hits regardless. Just stating that to go from a 30ish hr hitter to 15 (if he gets there) is a much steeper fall than projected. Just doesn’t look himself. Even his oppo hits that he’s doing a good job collecting are very soft liners or bloop fly balls.

  3. Sabr Chris

    It’s regression to his career norms, especially against lefties. Now he likely isn’t as bad as he’s been the last month, but his season numbers are still platformed by that inhuman May.

  4. roger garrett

    Castillo and the rest of this staff continue to struggle keeping the ball in the park especially at home and it looks like they will give up 200+ homers this year.This will have to improve and I think it will but we do play in the home of the wall scraping first row home run.Our offense is #12 in hitting homers with only 3 teams worse yet set at # 2 in obp and # 7 in runs scored which is middle of the pack.The Reds get a lot of hits(#3) and walks but in my opinion must improve power wise in 2019.We just can’t continue to get out homered especially at GABP regardless of how bad we pitch.Today was a classic example of a lot of our games at home.We only got out hit 10 to 7 but they had 5 home runs and well we had none.I went back and checked and in our now 66 losses we scored 3 runs or less in 39 of those games which is surprising for a team that is #7 in runs scored.There is no doubt our pitching has been bad and there is no doubt for this team to improve it must get much better but I just think we have more work to be concerned with then just the pitching.I just don’t see that we are good enough on offense especially our lack of power.

  5. gusnwally

    The reason for Votto’s decline is simple. I took him with my first round pick in our fantasy league. He immediately started working on that stupid defensive inside out swing. I think he has almost perfected it. 9 HR’s. Sheesh!!!!

    • da bear

      4 in a row in April or May.

      One of the 9 homers came off a position player throwing in the 80s at the end of a blowout.

      The decline was inevitable….but after the early success, very sudden and unanticipated.

      Next 6 years might be brutal. However, if Winker’s shoulder surgery goes well, JW should replace Votto’s $25MM production at well below market cost (which is a travesty to Winker).

  6. BigRedMike

    How is wRC a flawed stat?

    Votto has a 460 OBP

    What stat should be utilized in your opinion that is not flawed?

  7. da bear

    Amen. Not taking into account the importance of an at bat is a major major flaw of wRC+ and points toward the lack of correlation between wRC+ and the value of one’s offensive output for the team.

    • da bear

      Luck plays a huge part in outcomes. You also can’t predict luck. Quantum mechanical nature of the universe.

      If you want to measure individual offensive achievement, maybe wRC+ is a decent metric.

      If you want to measure contribution toward team success, you have to care about efficiency of scoring runs, efficiency of driving runs in, of advancing runners even if the ABs produce outs, and the speed that enables some of the runs that are scored. The single that Votto hit to drive in Billy from second was a clutch hit; however, I don’t think any other Reds runner scores on that hit. Most reds would have been held up at third, maybe Peraza gets sent home and is thrown out at the plate.

  8. da bear

    All ABs are treated the same. That’s the major flaw with wRC+. It might be the best stat that’s readily available, but it itself is a product of the limitations of the input variables.

    Regardless of how many runners are on base. Regardless of the relative importance of the AB toward the outcome of the game. Regardless of the score at the time of the AB.

    Lots of adjustments would be necessary to make wRC+ more relevant.

    Not saying it lacks any value whatsoever. Just wouldn’t emphasize wRC+ so much.

    You already have OBP to get at the heart of one’s ability to get on base.

    RBI by itself, without an additional calculation to get toward efficiency, is flawed. An average involving total bases including runners on base would get to the heart of weighting an AB by importance but I don’t know of any readily available baseball stats to take this into consideration. (Grand slam equals 10 for 10, K with bases loaded is 0 for 10, a walk in that situation is 4 for 10).

    You can probably think of better stats too.

    The flaw if anything is the idea that it is possible to reduce and summarize everything down to one simple output that provides value toward measuring the relative importance of one player versus another. Baseball, like life, is a little more complicated.