Saw this on Lance McAlister’s blog:
Stats for Austin Kearns through his first 365 games with the Reds and for Jay Bruce through his first 366 games (entering Tuesday) with the Reds.
***
Kearns/Bruce
Game: 365/366
PA: 1467/1452
AB: 1268/1305
R: 195/193
H: 337/333
2B: 71/57
3B: 6/8
HR: 55/68
RBI: 213/183
SB: 13/14
BB: 171/130
SO: 327/336
BA: .266/.255
OBP: .360/.324
SLG: .461/.467
OPS: .821/.791
Now, Kearns came up approximately a year older than Bruce, so that’s a difference…but other than that, does this concern anyone? Does it mean anything?